4 to 6 week diagnostic
Review the data estate, ownership, platform footprint, value opportunities, AI readiness and operating model gaps.
Board-ready view of what is working, what is blocked and what should happen next.Executive Data & AI Leader / Fractional CDO / Board & PE Adviser
I help PE-backed, scale-up and enterprise leadership teams turn fragmented data, reporting and platforms into trusted foundations the business can use, the kind of foundations that make AI actually work. I am an engineer by foundation, with deep experience in enterprise data, AI adoption and operating model change, and I can stand a credible capability up fast.
Which conversation are we having?
The work is usually part strategy, part operating model, part technology judgement and part adoption. It can take the shape of a diagnostic, a 90-day reset, a fractional or interim brief, or a focused advisory engagement.
Review the data estate, ownership, platform footprint, value opportunities, AI readiness and operating model gaps.
Board-ready view of what is working, what is blocked and what should happen next.Set the governance, product model, delivery rhythm, adoption plan and senior decision path so the team can move.
Clear operating rhythm, priority roadmap and decisions that unblock execution.Help leadership teams make better decisions on CDO/CDAO role design, AI readiness, platform simplification and value creation.
A safer brief, better sponsorship and clearer decision path.Engagements are usually shaped around a clear problem, sponsor and time horizon: a 4 to 6 week diagnostic, a 90-day reset, interim cover, or a focused advisory rhythm. Exact structure depends on the scope and decision path.
The strongest pattern in my work is turning fragmented systems, unclear ownership and low-trust data into something the business can use.
Problem: the business needed a real measure of how well it serves customers, beyond NPS and internal revenue numbers.
Intervention: I co-led the measurement behind VMO2's Customer Trust Indicator and my team built the Experience Trust Indicator on the enterprise data foundations we had created, turning hundreds of signals into a trusted score.
Result: proof that a trusted-data foundation can carry one of the company's most important measures, the kind of measurable, board-level outcome a PE-backed or founder business wants from its data.
Problem: fragmented reporting, weak ownership, manual workarounds and inconsistent definitions.
Intervention: operating model, governed business layers, 250+ certified data products, self-service, support and culture, led with a 300+ extended data delivery organisation across employees, contractors and vendor support, including Tableau to the Techs for 2,000+ field technicians and Martian Frontier as a data-culture mechanism.
Result: the programme launched 300+ Tableau dashboards, enabled 11,000+ colleagues to self-serve trusted data, and delivered measurable business value with at least £23m directly attributed since July 2024 on a conservative basis, part of circa £500M enabled across data-led initiatives including £100M+ in network investment optimisation.
Problem: business teams needed a trusted and governed way to start using AI with data.
Intervention: I set the framework and roadmap and managed the Google partnership, governance, privacy and adoption while my engineering team built, driving adoption of Gemini Enterprise, conversational analytics and data agents on governed data. Consolidated nine BI and data platforms into a modernised stack along the way.
Result: 2,500 of 5,000 Gemini Enterprise licences deployed, with data agents and conversational analytics live on governed data, and £13M+ in annual platform savings from consolidation. This is the data foundation that makes AI work, not a frontier-model build.
If this sounds close to the problem you are trying to solve, it is worth a conversation.
Discuss a role or engagementMoving data from fragmented, low-trust platforms toward governed business layers, Data Mesh patterns, self-service adoption and commercial value creation. The transformation lens I use is MASS: Mindset, Abilities, Systems and Structure.
These links are useful because they show the work from outside the CV: customer stories, interviews, speaking profiles and coverage from the data and cloud ecosystem.
The public Tableau customer story says Virgin Media O2 helped prevent £250m worth of fraud and blocked 92m+ malicious texts.
Executive feature on data democratisation at Virgin Media O2, framed as a cultural movement rather than a reporting programme.
Public speaker profile connected to enterprise AI, modernisation and human-centred transformation.
Public ecosystem references around data context, governance and enterprise adoption at Virgin Media O2.
Conversation from Google Cloud Next on agentic AI, modernisation and human-centred transformation.
Winner, Data Team of the Year (20+ people), plus finalist for Data Transformation of the Year. Judged by independent panel across the UK data and analytics industry.
Main-stage speaker at the Women in Data Flagship in 2025 with "CTRL + ALT + INCLUDE: Resetting Bias in Data & AI" and in 2026 with "From Data Curious to Data Confident", on building data confidence and trusted data and AI.
A short version of the career throughline: engineering foundations, enterprise data scale, AI adoption, and why this work matters now.
If the embedded video is blocked on your network, open the video directly. In three minutes, it covers the career throughline from engineering and SaaS platforms to enterprise data leadership, practical AI adoption and the kind of work I am now focused on.
This page is useful for fractional, interim and advisory conversations where the problem is important, the sponsorship is senior, and the work needs to become practical quickly.
Typically 1 to 3 days per week per client. UK-based. Remote-first as the default, with travel for board sessions, key workshops or leadership alignment where it genuinely adds value. A diagnostic or strategy sprint usually takes 4 to 6 weeks: clear assessment, board-ready readout and prioritised roadmap.
I do my best work where data and AI leadership comes with real scope: a business that wants judgement, a better operating model, genuine adoption and accountable progress, not just dashboards. If you are not sure whether your situation fits, share it anyway. I would rather hear it and give you an honest view than have you hold it back. And if it is not right for me, there is a good chance I know someone strong who it is right for.
The most useful first note is simple: the role, search or business problem, where the current data or AI work is stuck, and what would need to be true in 90 days for the conversation to be worth it.